Find the most suitable 3D printer for your needs.
We guide you to find the best option according to your needs.
Find the most suitable 3D scanner for your needs.
Contact us and we'll get it for you.
Find the most suitable filament for each application.
Find the most suitable resin for each application.
Find the most suitable powder for each application.
Find the most suitable pellets for each application.
Find the accessory you need for your 3D printer.
Find the ideal accessories for your 3D prints.
In the current environment of scientific research and technological development, where speed, customization, and economic efficiency are more necessary than ever, 3D printing has emerged as a decisive resource. Its ability to fabricate customized components on demand is transforming how researchers design, build, and validate their experimental setups. Whether in engineering, biology, physics, chemistry, or product design laboratories, additive manufacturing is offering new possibilities to adapt equipment to the particular demands of each experiment, without relying on standard solutions.
One of the most tangible benefits of integrating 3D printers into a laboratory is the drastic reduction in time between design and implementation. What once required days or even weeks using traditional machining processes can now be resolved in hours. From a digital CAD model, the researcher can go directly to a physical component, which significantly shortens the design-test-validation cycle.
This agility allows research teams to work in much faster cycles, continually iterating based on the results obtained in each experimental test.
Having access to in-house FDM 3D printing allows researchers to make design adjustments and reprint parts almost immediately. If a component does not work as expected, it can be modified and reprinted on the same day. This continuous iteration capability reduces downtime between tests and avoids relying on external suppliers or slow manufacturing processes. It is a direct boost to the productivity of experimentation processes.
3D printing offers unprecedented design freedom. Complex geometries, internal structures, integrated assemblies, and shapes impossible to achieve with conventional techniques can materialize in a single print. This is especially useful in experimental setups that require unique components, such as microscopy adapters, microfluidic systems, specialized supports, or assembly structures with multiple integrated functionalities.
Researchers are no longer tied to what laboratory material catalogs offer: they can create exactly what they need, how they need it, optimizing both design and experimental performance.
On many occasions, standard equipment does not fully fit the conditions of the experiment. Instead of compromising the experiment's design to adapt it to available equipment, laboratories can fabricate their own specific tools. For example, if a commercial container does not allow adequate microscopic observation, it is possible to print one with optimal dimensions and geometry for the application.
This ability to fabricate unique solutions allows each research to advance with the most appropriate tools, improving both the precision and repeatability of the results.
One of the pillars of 3D printing in the experimental context is the versatility of available materials. Researchers can choose from a wide range of options according to the physical, chemical, or mechanical needs of their experiments:
FDM: materials like PLA, ABS, PETG or nylon offer strong and economical parts.
SLA: resins with high resolution, some flexible or heat-resistant, ideal for micro-details or biomedical applications.
SLS: powders of PA11 nylon or TPU for durable, complex, and functional parts without supports.
It is even possible to print in metals or ceramics in advanced configurations. This variety allows for the fabrication of heat-resistant, chemical-resistant, sterilizable, or highly detailed components, depending on the experimental environment.
Cost savings are one of the most compelling arguments. 3D printing allows for the fabrication of customized parts at a fraction of the cost of acquiring or machining equivalent solutions. Cases have been documented where savings reached 90–97%, with printed parts costing as little as 1% of the price of their commercial versions.
For research groups with limited resources—such as university laboratories or startups—this economy allows funds to be allocated to other critical areas, such as reagents, analytical equipment, or personnel hiring. For example, a microscope accessory that would cost hundreds of euros can be printed for a few euros in material, without compromising quality or functionality.
One of the less visible but strategically most relevant elements of 3D printing is its ability to enable on-demand production. Instead of acquiring entire batches of parts in advance—with the consequent costs of inventory, storage, and obsolescence—laboratories can maintain only digital files ready to print when a part is actually needed. This eliminates the need to stock spare parts or rarely used parts, and frees up physical space and financial resources.
Additionally, 3D printing uses exactly the amount of material needed to fabricate the component, which reduces waste compared to subtractive methods like milling or turning. In practical terms, a researcher can perform multiple design iterations at an almost negligible cost, since each new prototype only requires a small amount of flexible filament or elastic resin. Compared to the cumulative costs of machining or external orders, this material efficiency is an advantage difficult to match.
Technological accessibility has led to a true democratization of manufacturing. Desktop FDM printers, high-resolution SLA systems, or even more advanced SLS equipment are now within reach of small R&D groups, university laboratories, or independent innovation teams. This availability eliminates reliance on centralized workshops and offers researchers direct and constant control over the creation of their experimental setups.
The ability to manufacture in-house provides speed, autonomy, and responsiveness. Each laboratory, with its own 3D printer, becomes a mini-production plant ready to iterate and experiment without external bottlenecks.
With 3D printing, research groups can forgo the long and costly process of outsourcing parts to machining workshops or specialized suppliers. It is no longer necessary to wait weeks to receive a customized part or to adjust an experimental design to the limitations imposed by delivery times. The entire cycle—from conception to implementation—is executed internally, within hours to days.
This level of self-sufficiency not only accelerates project timelines but also encourages experimentation. Researchers feel free to try unconventional designs, knowing that each attempt does not involve excessive expense or complex logistical procedures. The result is a more agile and creative culture within the laboratory.
The functionality of 3D printing is enhanced by the existence of scientific and technical communities that share designs under open licenses. Online repositories host thousands of print-ready files: from test tube holders to specialized optical components. This allows a researcher to start from an existing design and adapt it to their needs, drastically shortening development times.
This collaborative ecosystem facilitates distributed innovation: what one laboratory develops today, another can improve and reuse tomorrow. A recurring example is the design of 3D printable syringe pumps or centrifuges, shared among institutions for replication, validation, and continuous improvement. 3D printing thus becomes the engine of the open hardware movement applied to science.
Experimental setups often require connecting equipment that has not been designed to work together. Here, 3D printing allows the creation of adapters and accessories, fixtures, and intermediate structures that integrate different instruments precisely. A typical example is the design of a part that adapts a specific sensor to an already assembled experimental structure, improving compatibility without the need to modify the original equipment.
In a real case, a biochemistry lab designed and printed an adapter that doubled the capacity of a manifold, optimizing workflow and preventing interruptions. This type of solution directly improves experimental productivity through adjustments perfectly suited to the context.
Additive manufacturing is also used to extend the lifespan of laboratory equipment. When a component breaks or is no longer commercially available, it can be 3D scanned and replicated for a fraction of the cost of acquiring a new one. This happened in the case of a broken hinge on a thermal cycler, where the printed replacement saved the lab over €1,000.
Beyond repair, 3D printing allows for updating and improving existing equipment: from printing a custom baffle to modify airflow in a wind tunnel, to fabricating a bracket to add a camera to an old microscope. In these cases, functional compatibility no longer depends on the manufacturer, but on the research team's ability to design their own solutions.
The incorporation of 3D printing into experimental design processes represents a true methodological revolution in scientific research. Its advantages—agile prototyping, total customization, access to multiple technologies and materials, economic savings, and productive self-sufficiency—configure a new paradigm in how laboratories develop their tools.
This technology not only reduces costs and times but also expands the margins of creativity, improves the precision of experimental work, and fosters a more open and collaborative science. In an environment where every day counts and every resource matters, having a 3D printer in the laboratory is no longer a luxury: it is a strategic investment that turns ideas into tangible and functional solutions.
For any R&D team, 3D printing represents an opportunity to transform their internal capabilities, optimize their workflows, and advance with greater autonomy toward new frontiers of scientific knowledge.
I have read and accept the privacy policy.